This should be obvious or already implemented, but here it is in writing: If I have to ban you three times, the third time is permanent, regardless of whether its forum or ingame.

_________________________________________

a third forum strike doesn't translate to in-game does it?

_________________________________________

DeshTheWraith wrote:

a third forum strike doesn't translate to in-game does it?

He means them separately.

_________________________________________

Locke, where did you get that?

_________________________________________

Can they be retroactive?

_________________________________________

Baram wrote:

Can they be retroactive?

That wouldn't really be fair. However, if anyone can give me a lengthy, detailed post of why someone shouldn't be on FFO or the forums, I will consider it.

Aries wrote:

Locke, where did you get that?

Get what? This type of rule is pretty common.



_________________________________________

is there a certain time frame where bans will be forgiven? say like i had my first two bans like a year and half ago and mess up, will that still get me banned permanently??



_________________________________________

Nope, but it starts now, so if you had two bans a year and a half ago they wouldn't count, unless, as I said to Baram, someone comes up with a convincing argument.

_________________________________________

This seems reasonable. Also, I always thought their should be some sort of list with all of the people that are banned/permabanned from the game/forum and why they were banned.

_________________________________________

Asking where you found that spine, must've belonged to Dan. A lot better than the old one, that was was too easy on people.

_________________________________________

Haze wrote:

This seems reasonable. Also, I always thought their should be some sort of list with all of the people that are banned/permabanned from the game/forum and why they were banned.

Might do that, I'll think about it.



_________________________________________

Locke wrote:

Haze wrote:

This seems reasonable. Also, I always thought their should be some sort of list with all of the people that are banned/permabanned from the game/forum and why they were banned.

Might do that, I'll think about it.

Remember when we tried that last time?



_________________________________________

Locke wrote:

Nope, but it starts now, so if you had two bans a year and a half ago they wouldn't count, unless, as I said to Baram, someone comes up with a convincing argument.

So what about Zkiller and Vigo? if this is true, then their bans should not be counted aganst them and should be un permabanned?

_________________________________________

This doesn't mean that three strikes is the only way someone can be banned, and if this were retroactive, I'd have to spend a lot of time going through old stuff and probably a few people would end up banned.

_________________________________________

Locke wrote:

This doesn't mean that three strikes is the only way someone can be banned, and if this were retroactive, I'd have to spend a lot of time going through old stuff and probably a few people would end up banned.

Like me for example :P

_________________________________________

Yeah Black, you're a great example for just about any rules situation. :P

_________________________________________

Just wondering, how many strikes am i into?


Also, the rules are easy to follow, yea i have my moments, but it's all in fun.

I would ask for an Admin tryout. But i'll get flammed about it. "Look how the server would turn out, FFO would go into flames. Blax would ban for getting PK'D" Really no, but that's what others think. "Look he's an abuser"
But yea, really i based my acting as i came in. When i'm seriou, i don't type "ghetto" and I've been into the comynity for awhile.

_________________________________________

Black wrote:

Just wondering, how many strikes am i into?


Also, the rules are easy to follow, yea i have my moments, but it's all in fun.

I would ask for an Admin tryout. But i'll get flammed about it. "Look how the server would turn out, FFO would go into flames. Blax would ban for getting PK'D" Really no, but that's what others think. "Look he's an abuser"
But yea, really i based my acting as i came in. When i'm seriou, i don't type "ghetto" and I've been into the comynity for awhile.

nobody would understand half the decisions you'd make. (not a flame.)

_________________________________________

Baram wrote:

Black wrote:

Just wondering, how many strikes am i into?


Also, the rules are easy to follow, yea i have my moments, but it's all in fun.

I would ask for an Admin tryout. But i'll get flammed about it. "Look how the server would turn out, FFO would go into flames. Blax would ban for getting PK'D" Really no, but that's what others think. "Look he's an abuser"
But yea, really i based my acting as i came in. When i'm seriou, i don't type "ghetto" and I've been into the comynity for awhile.

nobody would understand half the decisions you'd make. (not a flame.)

Actually there wouldn't be anything i'll do out of the ordinary. I would play like a regular player, if something wrong were to happen, i mean think about it. I'll be there also i'm logged in half the time, and respect all my FFO Mates. literally even if it doesn't seem like it, once again i intend to role-play my char. And on how he was built up. Sowwie if it deceives you.

_________________________________________

Now that I think on it, this is a little bit too harsh. Why not have it be "Three bans in the space of a month" instead? Days where you're already banned not counting.

If you get smacked by the banhammer three times in one month, then you're obviously more interested in being a nuisance than playing the game.

_________________________________________