also i would like to say that Blax and Crew just ganked me in Ald and Followed me back from Argo to NI and Ganked me again, Gaku seen me dead in Ald, he was nice enough to Spawn Pugs to get Black away from Me so Hydro could get my DC, Thanks Gaku and Hydro, **** you Blax And Crew.

_________________________________________

Oh Wait, what can this be?

ADMIN ABUSE ANYONE!

_________________________________________

reply to Letto:

Professor wrote:

No, it isn't. It's also not abuse unless we say something such as someone's name meant to be secret.

_________________________________________

So I herd blax is raping ffo now. I find that rather amusing after all these years. It was bound to happen sooner or later... Karmas a ***** isn't it?

Also I herd an ex friend has returned?
Yes; I am popping by just to ease drop.

*smugs*

I might of missed something about wtf is going on but oh well.
I still find it surprising that blax became far worse than Norkia, rather amusing. :B

Edit:

Oh hi Desh; long time no chat. :D

_________________________________________

Moon Goddess Alpha wrote:

Karmas a ***** isn't it?

I question if you understand the full extent of Karma.

_________________________________________

Shane wrote:

Moon Goddess Alpha wrote:

Karmas a ***** isn't it?

I question if you understand the full extent of Karma.

If ye do good things, good happens to you, if ye do bad things, bad things happen to you. Is that what ye ask?
The good (sort of) part is; he is putting his foes in their place due to the crimes they committed in the past (If I herd correctly?), the bad part is... he is being like his foes if I am correct?

_________________________________________

Moon Goddess Alpha wrote:

Shane wrote:

Moon Goddess Alpha wrote:

Karmas a ***** isn't it?

I question if you understand the full extent of Karma.

If ye do good things, good happens to you, if ye do bad things, bad things happen to you. Is that what ye ask?
The good (sort of) part is; he is putting his foes in their place due to the crimes they committed in the past (If I herd correctly?), the bad part is... he is being like his foes if I am correct?

Considering the latter, an external force such as 'Karma' which has the inherent need to protect the balance between good and bad would not place the 'bad things happen to you' upon someone who has had bad things happened to them. This method would be flawed in that it innately sets up for an endless cycle of karmatic punishment.

Typically, retribution and reward through "karma" is received in such a way that it does not directly benefit or harm those outside of the receiver of the treatment, else this would go against the entire idea of balance by tipping the scales intentionally.

_________________________________________

Shane wrote:

Moon Goddess Alpha wrote:

Shane wrote:

Moon Goddess Alpha wrote:

Karmas a ***** isn't it?

I question if you understand the full extent of Karma.

If ye do good things, good happens to you, if ye do bad things, bad things happen to you. Is that what ye ask?
The good (sort of) part is; he is putting his foes in their place due to the crimes they committed in the past (If I herd correctly?), the bad part is... he is being like his foes if I am correct?

Considering the latter, an external force such as 'Karma' which has the inherent need to protect the balance between good and bad would not place the 'bad things happen to you' upon someone who has had bad things happened to them. This method would be flawed in that it innately sets up for an endless cycle of karmatic punishment.

Typically, retribution and reward through "karma" is received in such a way that it does not directly benefit or harm those outside of the receiver of the treatment, else this would go against the entire idea of balance by tipping the scales intentionally.

Those that get harmed without karma (which are the innocent) is just unlucky, karma can still play it's cards; even on the internet, I have seen it play it's self many times online...

_________________________________________

Moon Goddess Alpha wrote:

Shane wrote:

Moon Goddess Alpha wrote:

Shane wrote:

Moon Goddess Alpha wrote:

Karmas a ***** isn't it?

I question if you understand the full extent of Karma.

If ye do good things, good happens to you, if ye do bad things, bad things happen to you. Is that what ye ask?
The good (sort of) part is; he is putting his foes in their place due to the crimes they committed in the past (If I herd correctly?), the bad part is... he is being like his foes if I am correct?

Considering the latter, an external force such as 'Karma' which has the inherent need to protect the balance between good and bad would not place the 'bad things happen to you' upon someone who has had bad things happened to them. This method would be flawed in that it innately sets up for an endless cycle of karmatic punishment.

Typically, retribution and reward through "karma" is received in such a way that it does not directly benefit or harm those outside of the receiver of the treatment, else this would go against the entire idea of balance by tipping the scales intentionally.

Those that get harmed without karma is just unlucky, karma can still play it's cards; even on the internet, I have seen it play it's self many times online...

If karma isn't the primary force guiding punishment and reward, then who are you to determine when karma is in play and when it isn't?

Maybe this is just the logical next step in the ongoing war of punishment and abuse that is FFO.

_________________________________________

Shane wrote:

Moon Goddess Alpha wrote:

Shane wrote:

Moon Goddess Alpha wrote:

Shane wrote:

Moon Goddess Alpha wrote:

Karmas a ***** isn't it?

I question if you understand the full extent of Karma.

If ye do good things, good happens to you, if ye do bad things, bad things happen to you. Is that what ye ask?
The good (sort of) part is; he is putting his foes in their place due to the crimes they committed in the past (If I herd correctly?), the bad part is... he is being like his foes if I am correct?

Considering the latter, an external force such as 'Karma' which has the inherent need to protect the balance between good and bad would not place the 'bad things happen to you' upon someone who has had bad things happened to them. This method would be flawed in that it innately sets up for an endless cycle of karmatic punishment.

Typically, retribution and reward through "karma" is received in such a way that it does not directly benefit or harm those outside of the receiver of the treatment, else this would go against the entire idea of balance by tipping the scales intentionally.

Those that get harmed without karma is just unlucky, karma can still play it's cards; even on the internet, I have seen it play it's self many times online...

If karma isn't the primary force guiding punishment and reward, then who are you to determine when karma is in play and when it isn't?

Maybe this is just the logical next step in the ongoing war of punishment and abuse that is FFO.

I do not decide I just watch.
It is already decided after the action is committed.
If ye remain lost on wtf I am talking about, then ye will have to figure it out on your own. Observe...

_________________________________________

Moon Goddess Alpha wrote:

Shane wrote:

Moon Goddess Alpha wrote:

Shane wrote:

Moon Goddess Alpha wrote:

Shane wrote:

Moon Goddess Alpha wrote:

Karmas a ***** isn't it?

I question if you understand the full extent of Karma.

If ye do good things, good happens to you, if ye do bad things, bad things happen to you. Is that what ye ask?
The good (sort of) part is; he is putting his foes in their place due to the crimes they committed in the past (If I herd correctly?), the bad part is... he is being like his foes if I am correct?

Considering the latter, an external force such as 'Karma' which has the inherent need to protect the balance between good and bad would not place the 'bad things happen to you' upon someone who has had bad things happened to them. This method would be flawed in that it innately sets up for an endless cycle of karmatic punishment.

Typically, retribution and reward through "karma" is received in such a way that it does not directly benefit or harm those outside of the receiver of the treatment, else this would go against the entire idea of balance by tipping the scales intentionally.

Those that get harmed without karma is just unlucky, karma can still play it's cards; even on the internet, I have seen it play it's self many times online...

If karma isn't the primary force guiding punishment and reward, then who are you to determine when karma is in play and when it isn't?

Maybe this is just the logical next step in the ongoing war of punishment and abuse that is FFO.

I do not decide I just watch.
It is already decided after the action is committed.
If ye remain lost on wtf I am talking about, then ye will have to figure it out on your own. Observe...

Not really lost. I am just of the opinion that you are misguided.

_________________________________________

Shane wrote:

Moon Goddess Alpha wrote:

Shane wrote:

Moon Goddess Alpha wrote:

Shane wrote:

Moon Goddess Alpha wrote:

Shane wrote:

Moon Goddess Alpha wrote:

Karmas a ***** isn't it?

I question if you understand the full extent of Karma.

If ye do good things, good happens to you, if ye do bad things, bad things happen to you. Is that what ye ask?
The good (sort of) part is; he is putting his foes in their place due to the crimes they committed in the past (If I herd correctly?), the bad part is... he is being like his foes if I am correct?

Considering the latter, an external force such as 'Karma' which has the inherent need to protect the balance between good and bad would not place the 'bad things happen to you' upon someone who has had bad things happened to them. This method would be flawed in that it innately sets up for an endless cycle of karmatic punishment.

Typically, retribution and reward through "karma" is received in such a way that it does not directly benefit or harm those outside of the receiver of the treatment, else this would go against the entire idea of balance by tipping the scales intentionally.

Those that get harmed without karma is just unlucky, karma can still play it's cards; even on the internet, I have seen it play it's self many times online...

If karma isn't the primary force guiding punishment and reward, then who are you to determine when karma is in play and when it isn't?

Maybe this is just the logical next step in the ongoing war of punishment and abuse that is FFO.

I do not decide I just watch.
It is already decided after the action is committed.
If ye remain lost on wtf I am talking about, then ye will have to figure it out on your own. Observe...

Not really lost. I am just of the opinion that you are misguided.

Or am I? We shall see won't we?
Who wishes to rule this pyramid?

_________________________________________

Moon Goddess Alpha wrote:

Shane wrote:

Moon Goddess Alpha wrote:

Shane wrote:

Moon Goddess Alpha wrote:

Shane wrote:

Moon Goddess Alpha wrote:

Shane wrote:

Moon Goddess Alpha wrote:

Karmas a ***** isn't it?

I question if you understand the full extent of Karma.

If ye do good things, good happens to you, if ye do bad things, bad things happen to you. Is that what ye ask?
The good (sort of) part is; he is putting his foes in their place due to the crimes they committed in the past (If I herd correctly?), the bad part is... he is being like his foes if I am correct?

Considering the latter, an external force such as 'Karma' which has the inherent need to protect the balance between good and bad would not place the 'bad things happen to you' upon someone who has had bad things happened to them. This method would be flawed in that it innately sets up for an endless cycle of karmatic punishment.

Typically, retribution and reward through "karma" is received in such a way that it does not directly benefit or harm those outside of the receiver of the treatment, else this would go against the entire idea of balance by tipping the scales intentionally.

Those that get harmed without karma is just unlucky, karma can still play it's cards; even on the internet, I have seen it play it's self many times online...

If karma isn't the primary force guiding punishment and reward, then who are you to determine when karma is in play and when it isn't?

Maybe this is just the logical next step in the ongoing war of punishment and abuse that is FFO.

I do not decide I just watch.
It is already decided after the action is committed.
If ye remain lost on wtf I am talking about, then ye will have to figure it out on your own. Observe...

Not really lost. I am just of the opinion that you are misguided.

Or am I? We shall see won't we?
Who wishes to rule this pyramid?

Okay, I will admit, you got me LOLing with that.

Kudos for that joke.

_________________________________________

Shane wrote:

Moon Goddess Alpha wrote:

Shane wrote:

Moon Goddess Alpha wrote:

Shane wrote:

Moon Goddess Alpha wrote:

Shane wrote:

Moon Goddess Alpha wrote:

Shane wrote:

Moon Goddess Alpha wrote:

Karmas a ***** isn't it?

I question if you understand the full extent of Karma.

If ye do good things, good happens to you, if ye do bad things, bad things happen to you. Is that what ye ask?
The good (sort of) part is; he is putting his foes in their place due to the crimes they committed in the past (If I herd correctly?), the bad part is... he is being like his foes if I am correct?

Considering the latter, an external force such as 'Karma' which has the inherent need to protect the balance between good and bad would not place the 'bad things happen to you' upon someone who has had bad things happened to them. This method would be flawed in that it innately sets up for an endless cycle of karmatic punishment.

Typically, retribution and reward through "karma" is received in such a way that it does not directly benefit or harm those outside of the receiver of the treatment, else this would go against the entire idea of balance by tipping the scales intentionally.

Those that get harmed without karma is just unlucky, karma can still play it's cards; even on the internet, I have seen it play it's self many times online...

If karma isn't the primary force guiding punishment and reward, then who are you to determine when karma is in play and when it isn't?

Maybe this is just the logical next step in the ongoing war of punishment and abuse that is FFO.

I do not decide I just watch.
It is already decided after the action is committed.
If ye remain lost on wtf I am talking about, then ye will have to figure it out on your own. Observe...

Not really lost. I am just of the opinion that you are misguided.

Or am I? We shall see won't we?
Who wishes to rule this pyramid?

Okay, I will admit, you got me LOLing with that.

Kudos for that joke.

Yes...

Who of FFO wants to be pharaoh of this Pyramid?
Maybe Gaku should add a Pyramid onto FFO as a feature of amusement! (obviously won't happen but it would be fun to have more dungeons to explore and die for...)

Now I bid farewell.. Ta ta!

*vanishes*

_________________________________________

Moon Goddess Alpha wrote:

Shane wrote:

Moon Goddess Alpha wrote:

Shane wrote:

Moon Goddess Alpha wrote:

Shane wrote:

Moon Goddess Alpha wrote:

Shane wrote:

Moon Goddess Alpha wrote:

Shane wrote:

Moon Goddess Alpha wrote:

Karmas a ***** isn't it?

I question if you understand the full extent of Karma.

If ye do good things, good happens to you, if ye do bad things, bad things happen to you. Is that what ye ask?
The good (sort of) part is; he is putting his foes in their place due to the crimes they committed in the past (If I herd correctly?), the bad part is... he is being like his foes if I am correct?

Considering the latter, an external force such as 'Karma' which has the inherent need to protect the balance between good and bad would not place the 'bad things happen to you' upon someone who has had bad things happened to them. This method would be flawed in that it innately sets up for an endless cycle of karmatic punishment.

Typically, retribution and reward through "karma" is received in such a way that it does not directly benefit or harm those outside of the receiver of the treatment, else this would go against the entire idea of balance by tipping the scales intentionally.

Those that get harmed without karma is just unlucky, karma can still play it's cards; even on the internet, I have seen it play it's self many times online...

If karma isn't the primary force guiding punishment and reward, then who are you to determine when karma is in play and when it isn't?

Maybe this is just the logical next step in the ongoing war of punishment and abuse that is FFO.

I do not decide I just watch.
It is already decided after the action is committed.
If ye remain lost on wtf I am talking about, then ye will have to figure it out on your own. Observe...

Not really lost. I am just of the opinion that you are misguided.

Or am I? We shall see won't we?
Who wishes to rule this pyramid?

Okay, I will admit, you got me LOLing with that.

Kudos for that joke.

Yes...

Who of FFO wants to be pharaoh of this Pyramid?
Maybe Gaku should add a Pyramid onto FFO as a feature of amusement! (obviously won't happen but it would be fun to have more dungeons to explore and die for...)

Now I bid farewell.. Ta ta!

*vanishes*

ya, a New area to explore would be nice, i also havent seen a Quote Pyramid like this in a while


_________________________________________

c-c-c-combo-breaker

*wins*

_________________________________________

You win!

PERFECT!

_________________________________________

reply to Moon Goddess Alpha:

Hello you.

_________________________________________

Moon Goddess Alpha wrote:

You win!

PERFECT!

Damn Maenads!

_________________________________________

i apply to add sai to this ban

_________________________________________