Grameramera wrote:

I got an old laptop up and running yesterday.
It has an FFO source from early 2010.

I propose that the 2010 server be hosted instead of the 2008 server if revert is voted upon.

The 2010 server was less buggy, had far less room for abuse (no masters ****ting out damage with guns, no ninja stealing from dragons, less room for duping, etc), was one of the most successful and enduring hostings of FFO (almost a year and a half), and was arguably the most balanced hosting that I've played ( I mean come on, did people ***** on the forums NEARLY as much as they do now back then?)

More balanced than '08.
Less abuse than '08.
Less buggy than '08 (weren't there like a thousand ways to crash the server back then anyway).
Icon Checker did not exist in '08 = icons

The 2010 hosting would be clearly superior to the 2008 hosting, while still allowing you brats to have experience, which was pretty much why you guys hate this current hosting.

_________________________________________

reply to Dr. Letha:

I'd agree that this would have way less problems than the 2008 version in many ways. I'd find it much easier to deal with administration issues this way too.

Also, default icons are fugly.

_________________________________________

I Agree, but masters would need some buffs and rw some nerfs xO!

_________________________________________

honestly, i even said that if we HAVE to revert, i'd prefer 2010. it still has some BAAAD bugs, but it fixes most of the big problems from 2008 and it excludes less people from the brief bit of nostalga

_________________________________________

I agree to reverting it back to 10'

_________________________________________

errr wut?
Wasn't knights nerfed in that version?
I'm lost. D:>

_________________________________________

Yes yes and yes. Double triple ultra yes

_________________________________________

Edit: Momo's vote is invalid.

*walks away*

_________________________________________

MoonCross wrote:

Don't shoot me but Momo voted yes for this, but meh...
I'm just being her lil messenger.

*walks away*

-shoots-

_________________________________________

*deflects back at you* _________________________________________ *Yawns* What now?

reply to MoonCross:

If they're that desperate they can voice their opinions on the FFO Consortium if possible. Kumog has warned people not to carry messages for those who are banned, without exception.

_________________________________________

I see you found some Addy Leggings of the Whalein

_________________________________________

reply to Professor:

Ok noted, I think that was her idea.
Thanks for the warning.

_________________________________________

I actually think I'd be ok with a 2010. I've been torn on it but 2010 doesn't sound so bad.

_________________________________________

Any sort of revert shouldn't happen until this server wipes for a legit reason anyway <<<

_________________________________________

Killa wrote:

Any sort of revert shouldn't happen until this server wipes for a legit reason anyway <<<

Though man, it's lucky to have 9 players throughout the week so a wipe could be viable right now.

_________________________________________

I actually agree with killa on this, I'd like a LITTLE more time this hosting, its depressing to finally gettin a good foothold on a character or three and having to wipe so soon

_________________________________________

Sacrededge wrote:

Killa wrote:

Any sort of revert shouldn't happen until this server wipes for a legit reason anyway <<<

Though man, it's lucky to have 9 players throughout the week so a wipe could be viable right now.

A reverted server is probably going to spike at the beginning and have less than this on average after people start remembering what was wrong with the older version.

_________________________________________

Killa wrote:

Sacrededge wrote:

Killa wrote:

Any sort of revert shouldn't happen until this server wipes for a legit reason anyway <<<

Though man, it's lucky to have 9 players throughout the week so a wipe could be viable right now.

A reverted server is probably going to spike at the beginning and have less than this on average after people start remembering what was wrong with the older version.

We won't be able to judge that till it actually reverts. maybe we could let level cap get to 55 and give it till end of next weekend before revert?

_________________________________________

Sacrededge wrote:

Killa wrote:

Sacrededge wrote:

Killa wrote:

Any sort of revert shouldn't happen until this server wipes for a legit reason anyway <<<

Though man, it's lucky to have 9 players throughout the week so a wipe could be viable right now.

A reverted server is probably going to spike at the beginning and have less than this on average after people start remembering what was wrong with the older version.

We won't be able to judge that till it actually reverts. maybe we could let level cap get to 55 and give it till end of next weekend before revert?

Host 2 servers or wait for a real reason to pwipe <<<

_________________________________________